Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Instructional Methodology topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meads Mill rolls out Building Thinking Classrooms to boost engagement across subjects
Summary
Northville Public Schools’ Meads Mill Middle School presented a year-long effort to use Building Thinking Classrooms strategies — randomized grouping, vertical nonpermanent boards and rich thinking tasks — to increase student attention, collaborative problem solving and retention across math, science and English.
The Northville Public Schools Board of Education heard a detailed presentation Tuesday from Meads Mill Middle School teachers and students on rolling out Building Thinking Classrooms, an instructional approach the school is expanding across subject areas.
School leaders said the approach focuses on “authentic engagement” — high attention paired with high commitment — by giving students thinking tasks, frequently forming randomized groups, and using vertical, nonpermanent surfaces for visible group work. Dr. Carrie Zielinski, the presenter, told the board the method is grounded in research and centers on 14 classroom factors that change how students engage with tasks.
The initiative matters because Meads Mill leaders said it shifts students from passive compliance to active problem solving. “We want students to be here to learn and enjoy learning with each other collaboratively in safe spaces,” Dr. Zielinski said. Teachers and administrators described the approach as a district-level engagement strategy that can be applied across math, science and English.
Teachers explained concrete practices. Classrooms use randomized grouping (frequent, visibly random groups), vertical whiteboards so thinking is visible and shared, and role guidance (for example, a single marker per group with the marker holder recording others’ thinking rather than writing only their own work). Christy Mauer, one of the teachers leading the effort, described a phased rollout: “Tackle a fourth of this at a time… put your focus there, and then move on.” Teachers said they began with thinking tasks and randomized grouping and plan to add other practices in later cycles.
Students who participated in classroom demonstrations told the board they found the work more engaging and memorable than traditional lessons. “It was fun. It was engaging. Collaborative,” said Erin, a Meads Mill student. Students described strengthened teamwork, improved recall for tests and greater confidence when discussing solutions aloud.
Teachers described how they combine the approach with technology: lessons may start in Desmos or on devices, but instructors may “close the computers” and move to boards when a task requires deeper collaboration. Tanya Traylor, an English teacher using the strategy, said the vertical, nonpermanent surfaces produced livelier discussion and better recall for writing lessons.
No formal board action was requested or taken; presenters asked the board to note the approach and support continued professional development. Teachers said they will refine note-taking and consolidation steps so group work links directly to students’ permanent records.
Board members praised the pilot and asked to see further evidence of impact on assessments and transfer to seatwork. Teachers said they will continue rolling the program into additional grade levels and content areas next school year.
