Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council hears lengthy briefing on affordable-housing numbers and state mediation; attorney urges regional challenge
Summary
Borough counsel and special counsel updated the council on ongoing affordable-housing litigation and mediation, criticizing New Jersey’s methodology for assigning municipal quotas and describing procedural developments including a mediator assignment and the involvement of planners and the Builders Association.
Get email alerts on the Housing Affordable Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Borough special counsel provided an extended update on ongoing affordable‑housing litigation and mediation, arguing that state agency methodology and court processes are producing obligations that do not match available buildable land.
Attorney Michael Pezois (council counsel) said a New Jersey Builders Association filing and responses from Fair Share Housing had prompted new analyses. Pezois described work by planner David Kinsey, retained by Fair Share Housing, who reviewed Hawthorne’s calculations and — while agreeing the borough’s math was accurate — proposed a regional adjustment that would increase Hawthorne’s obligation. Pezois said the process creates a mismatch between theoretical obligations and practical buildable land in Hawthorne and similar communities.
Pezois told the council that an assigned mediator, retired Judge Thomas Brogan, is familiar with Hawthorne from prior rounds and that a facilitator (formerly called a special master), Christine Caffone, will again oversee aspects of the process. He said a conference with the judge, facilitator, plaintiffs and defendants is scheduled and that the borough will need to spend funds on counsel and expert analysis. Pezois described the implementation as “disastrous” in practice and urged that the matter be raised more broadly, noting other communities are also challenging the Department of Community Affairs’ (DCA) assumptions.
Why this matters: The outcome of the court-assisted mediation and the methodology used to assign affordable-housing obligations can impose long-term development responsibilities on the borough or require the borough to identify vacant land or accept regional reallocation. Pezois said there are active multi-community challenges and that implementation choices by courts and state agencies have broad consequences for local planning.
Details from the meeting: Counsel reviewed the status of filings and the mediator assignment, outlined expected next steps and said the borough will continue to litigate or negotiate its position. No final vote or directive to settle was recorded; the council was briefed and counsel indicated a conference is scheduled with the mediator and parties.

