Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Statutory Technical Amendments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances reviser’s bill that makes 72 non-substantive edits across Colorado statutes

House Judiciary [Apr 30, 2025] · April 30, 2025

Summary

Senate Bill 300, the reviser’s bill from the Committee on Legal Services, was advanced unanimously after sponsors described 72 technical, non-substantive drafting changes to the Colorado Revised Statutes.

Senate Bill 300, the annual reviser’s bill from the Committee on Legal Services, was moved forward by the House Judiciary Committee on a unanimous 11-0 vote. Sponsors said the measure makes 72 technical or non-substantive edits to the Colorado Revised Statutes to improve drafting clarity without changing substantive law.

Representative Camacho, presenting the bill, described an example edit to a workers’-compensation physician-accreditation section (8-42-1013(6)) and noted an appendix in the bill packet listing all 72 edits and their rationales. Committee members thanked reviser staff for their drafting work. One member asked whether broader drafting-practice guidance (for example the hyphenation of “health-care”) could be changed here; sponsors and staff said changes to the drafting manual would be a separate matter outside the bill’s scope.

No public witnesses appeared in opposition; a lone potential opponent was not present. Representative Camacho moved the bill to the committee of the whole with a favorable recommendation; Vice Chair Carter seconded. The roll call recorded 11 yes votes, and the committee forwarded the bill without amendments.

Votes at a glance: SB 300 — Motion: move to Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation; Mover: Representative Camacho; Second: Vice Chair Carter; Vote: 11 yes, 0 no; Outcome: passed to Committee of the Whole.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source