Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legal Discovery Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances bill clarifying Attorney General discovery role; moves to committee of the whole
Summary
The House Finance Committee voted to advance Senate Bill 322 to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation, 11–2, after sponsors described the reengrossed measure as a technical clarification of discovery procedures involving the attorney general.
The House Finance Committee advanced Senate Bill 322 to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation, voting 11–2. Vice Chair Tatone moved the measure and Representative Camacho seconded the motion.
Sponsor testimony described the reengrossed bill as a narrowly focused clarification of discovery procedures when the attorney general brings litigation in an independent capacity. "Third party discovery is still an option," the sponsor said, explaining the bill clarifies how courts and litigants should obtain agency records when the attorney general is not acting as the agency's counsel.
Witnesses included two remote participants. Natalie Minton, testifying as a neutral party, said she was hesitant to endorse last-minute measures and asked for more time to consider policy implications. Jeffrey Reester of the Department of Law said the department supports the technical change and framed the bill as a process clarification: bringing agencies who are not parties into litigation as if the attorney general were the custodian has created confusion. "It's more about the process and the route in which they go in order to get it," Reester said.
Committee members asked several policy and procedural questions. Representative Joseph and others asked why the change was better public policy than the existing practice in which the attorney general could be compelled to produce documents. Reester and other legislative staff testified that the bill does not prevent discovery; rather, it directs parties to seek records from the agency that controls them, which can be more efficient when the attorney general is not the agency's counsel. Law-drafting staff confirmed the reengrossed version removed earlier provisions that had addressed critical-infrastructure and proprietary-information concerns; Reester said that removal reflected a decision to narrow the title and address broader policy in a later discussion.
After discussion and the witness phase, Vice Chair Tatone moved the bill to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation; Representative Camacho seconded. Miss Shipley called the roll; the chair announced the motion passed 11 to 2.
