Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House committee narrows HB 12‑60 after testimony on grid resilience, adopts amendment to rely on existing FERC/NERC reports
Summary
After testimony from utilities, the PUC and federal‑sector experts, the committee adopted amendment L005 to shift reporting work to utilities and rely on FERC/NERC Critical Energy Infrastructure Information (CEII) reports; the amended bill moved to Committee of the Whole on an 8–5 vote.
Representative De Graaf introduced House Bill 12‑60 as a review and reporting requirement to help the legislature understand Colorado’s ability to respond to geomagnetic disturbances and other large threats to the electric grid. Sponsors framed the bill as an information-gathering measure to identify shortfalls, timelines for restoring power and whether federal resilience funds could be leveraged for upgrades.
During the witness phase, the committee heard from public utilities, trade groups and security experts. The Public Utilities Commission director said the PUC shares the intent of improving resilience but cautioned that Colorado is part of an integrated regional grid and that major investments to harden equipment could be costly and ultimately depend on federal and regional coordination. Electricity-sector witnesses said industry already uses an all-hazards approach to resilience and complies with North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) standards; Xcel Energy staff pointed to existing monitoring and compliance work and cautioned that prescriptive state mandates could duplicate NERC requirements and shift costs to ratepayers.
REACTION AND AMENDMENT: In response to testimony and stakeholder concerns, sponsors offered amendment L005, which removes prescriptive equipment mandates and directs utilities subject to NERC jurisdiction to request, review and brief the legislature on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s CEII (Critical Energy Infrastructure Information) reports and to identify shortfalls and restoration timelines. Legislative staff confirmed that L005 reduces the bill’s fiscal impact on the Public Utilities Commission by shifting analysis responsibility to utilities; LCS reported the PUC would have only minimal additional workload. The amendment retained an evaluation function and kept existing restoration-time considerations (committee heard a specific example that a G5-level geomagnetic storm’s recovery timeline was discussed during testimony, including a reference to a 5‑day restoration target for generation in a severe storm scenario).
VOTE: After amendment debate, Representative De Graaf moved the amended bill to the Committee of the Whole. The committee approved that motion on a roll call, 8–5; sponsors said the amendment should address many stakeholder concerns and produce a zero fiscal impact for the PUC staff workload.
NEXT STEPS: HB 12‑60 (as amended) will proceed to the Committee of the Whole with the record of testimony encouraging coordination with federal partners (FERC, NERC, DHS, DOE) and attention to wildfire and other more-immediate grid threats noted by the PUC.
ENDING: Sponsors emphasized the value of an informed legislative record and the ability to leverage federal resilience funds if shortfalls are identified; utilities reiterated that compliance and national-level research are important complements to any state-level activity.
