Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House Education Committee advances framework to sustain K–5 social-emotional programs

3506265 · April 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Colorado House Education Committee voted 7–5 to send Senate Bill 178 to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation. The bill would direct the Colorado Department of Education to develop rules to allow competitive grant programs supporting K–5 social and emotional health to be folded into future school finance formulas.

The Colorado House Education Committee voted 7–5 to send Senate Bill 178 to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation. The bill sponsor, Representative Gilchrist, said the measure would create a structured process for the Colorado Department of Education (CDE) to consolidate and sustain competitive grants that fund social and emotional supports in K–5 schools.

Supporters and witnesses told the committee the bill would help sustain programs that place mental-health professionals in elementary schools and would streamline dozens of competitive grants that currently operate under separate rules. "I urge your support for Senate Bill 178 for the sake of our students, our teachers, and the future of education in Colorado," Representative Gilchrist said.

Jordan Posamenteier, vice president of policy and partnerships at Committee for Children, testified that the bill builds on an existing pilot and ties the initiative to chronic absenteeism. "Chronic absenteeism in particular, which means, kids missing more than 10% of the days enrolled in school, was already a major concern in Colorado prior to the pandemic," Posamenteier said, arguing social-emotional learning can help reduce absenteeism and improve long-term outcomes for students.

Benjamin Teavon, also representing Committee for Children, described the bill as a process tool rather than a funding mandate. "This is not a mandate on schools and that's why you have a 0 fiscal note," he told the committee, adding that CDE staff said they can carry out the rulemaking with existing resources. Teavon said the measure is intended to create a "shelf-ready" framework so the legislature can more easily decide in future years whether to fold particular grant programs into the school finance formula.

Committee members pressed sponsors and witnesses on several points. Representative Phillips asked whether the bill's language should explicitly include asylum-seeking students as well as refugees; witnesses said they could follow up. Representatives Garcia Sander and Hartzook questioned the list of metrics in the bill, noting some measures — dropout rate and graduation rate — are normally used for secondary schools and may not be informative for K–5 programs. Witnesses said those metrics were among measures used by the five pilot sites and that kindergarten chronic absenteeism can provide an early signal of broader problems.

Members also raised practical questions about program design. Representative Bradfield asked how much classroom time would be devoted to social-emotional programming and cautioned that adding requirements could displace instruction in reading, writing, math, music or PE. Witnesses responded that the five districts in the pilot implemented the program differently and that the pilot — which the committee heard was extended because of COVID — was voluntary for participating districts.

Committee testimony and sponsor remarks included additional details: CDE conducted a review of 31 competitive state grants totaling more than $80,000,000; the underlying social-emotional learning pilot was established by 2019 legislation and was extended through July 1 of the current year; the five pilot locations named during the hearing included Cherry Creek, Aurora, Canyon City and a district identified as "South Route," plus at least one charter school; and the bill carries a fiscal note of $0 because CDE said it can produce rules using existing staff and resources.

After closing remarks from Representative Gilchrist and other members, the committee voted to advance the bill. The motion to move Senate Bill 178 to the Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation passed 7–5 with one excused member. The bill will next be considered by the Committee of the Whole.

Votes at a glance: Senate Bill 178 — Motion to send to Committee of the Whole with a favorable recommendation; mover: Representative Gilchrist; second: Vice Chair Martinez; outcome: approved 7–5 with 1 excused. Yes: Gilchrist; Hamrick; Phillips; Smith; Story; Martinez; Madam Chair. No: Radfield; Caldwell; Garcia Sander; Hartsock; Johnson. Excused: Bacon.