Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Monitoring topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee reviews multiyear energy monitoring agreement; members request sole‑source documentation and recent savings evidence
Summary
Staff presented a multiyear proposal with ARTIS Energy Intelligence for energy monitoring and analytics. The vendor maintains proprietary submeters in district buildings; counsel said a 2018 sole‑source letter covers the equipment. Members asked staff to provide the sole‑source letter, recent savings reports, and a clear per‑year cost breakdown.
The committee discussed a proposed multiyear agreement with ARTIS Energy Intelligence to continue energy monitoring and analytics for district buildings. Staff said the vendor’s submeters and platform help identify opportunities such as schedule optimization, demand management and billing consolidation, and cited a peer example of a 12% annual energy reduction equivalent to about $700,000 in savings.
Board members asked for written evidence of ARTIS’s recent performance and whether the city purchasing office’s sole‑source determination remains current. District counsel said a sole‑source letter dated Feb. 2, 2018, states the installed electric meters are proprietary and only ARTIS’s software can read them; counsel also acknowledged that a new sole‑source determination or re‑certification would typically be required under current purchasing practice.
Committee members requested the purchasing agent’s sole‑source letter and its expiration details be attached to the packet. They also asked staff to add the verbal savings examples to the memo and to provide a year‑by‑year cost split for the multiyear proposal. One board member asked whether ARTIS’s services duplicate utility AMI metering and whether other vendors could provide alternative services.
Why it matters: Energy monitoring contracts carry capital and operating implications. Board members said they want updated procurement documentation and objective evidence that the vendor’s work generates net savings greater than the contract cost before endorsing a multiyear commitment.
