Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Charter revision panel backs organizational chart, asks first selectman to assign staff liaisons; tweaks 10% variance wording
Summary
The Fairfield Charter Revision Commission on Jan. 22 adopted recommendations asking the first selectman to create an organizational chart for town boards and to designate a town officer to advise appointed boards; the panel also voted to change charter wording on district deviation to read “shall be less than 10%,” after attorney input.
FAIRFIELD — The Charter Revision Commission on Jan. 22 voted to ask the first selectman to produce an organizational chart covering town boards and commissions and to designate a town officer to serve as a staff liaison or adviser to each appointed board, commissioners said during a lengthy discussion of how boards are governed and how they fit into the town’s administrative structure.
Those actions were adopted as a pair of sense-of-the-body recommendations after members spent more than two hours discussing which commissions should remain in the charter, which could be carried in town code, and how volunteer boards should be connected to town departments for administration and accountability.
The commission’s chair, Commissioner Chris DeWitt, introduced the idea of a chart that would “include all commissions and boards” so that volunteer bodies have a clear reporting path into a town department. He said the commission would recommend the chart be prepared outside the charter and delivered to the board of selectmen as part of the CRC’s final work. “I will make a motion to sense of the body that the end product we deliver to the board of selectmen have at least a template for an organizational chart that must include all commissions and boards and a reporting structure,” DeWitt said.
Why it matters: Commissioners said unclear departmental links leave some volunteer bodies without a staff contact to process paperwork, oversee procurement or coordinate budgeting. Commissioners repeatedly cited the Water Pollution Control Authority (WPCA) as an example where current organizational lines — the authority’s charter language and its administrative ties to the Department of Public Works — have created confusion about day-to-day supervision and accountability.
Discussion highlights and staff role recommendation
Commissioners debated whether to move many boards from charter text into municipal code but…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

