Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Muc Benchmarking Mattaqueese topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
MUC housing pod narrows benchmarking choices, plans public survey and site sketches
Summary
Town of Yarmouth committees reviewing the Mattaqueese Utilization Committee work plan discussed benchmarking examples for rental and homeownership models, public outreach via a town survey, parking estimates and next steps for sketch plans and consultant work.
Members of the Town of Yarmouth's Mattaqueese (MUC) housing pod and related committees reviewed benchmarking examples for rental and homeownership housing at a meeting that also covered public outreach, parking calculations and next steps for site sketches and consultant work.
Why it matters: The Mattaqueese site work feeds the town's local comprehensive planning and will shape how much housing, what types (rental vs. homeownership) and which amenities might be feasible on the property. Committee decisions about density, unit mix and shared amenities will affect land use, parking needs and potential state subsidy eligibility.
Discussion summary Committee members and consultants from the town's consultant teams (BSC Group and Barrett Planning mentioned in the packet) described a work plan that includes benchmarking, a public survey and sketches showing potential layouts. The committee is preparing a public survey to be distributed via the town website, email notifications, the library and senior center; members discussed a publicity blitz and a three- to four-week response window to encourage broad participation.
On benchmarking, the group reviewed ten-plus example developments across scales and agreed to recommend one example for a moderate-scale rental (Yarmouth Commons) and one for an elevated-scale rental (Heritage/number 8 on the packet). Committee members said they preferred smaller, broken-up building forms and cottage-like or courtyard layouts over single large "monolithic" buildings; they cited examples such as Yarmouth Commons, Mashpee Village and Sea Captain's Row for community-oriented site design.
The committee flagged several site-planning issues that will shape feasibility and density: dedicated versus shared parking, required parking estimates (a rule-of-thumb discussed was about 350 square feet per space including circulation, or roughly 1.5 spaces per unit), accessibility and the need for some ranch-style/one-story units for full accessibility. Members discussed potential shared parking agreements (for example, allowing event/field parking to be shared with residents) and suggested dedicated resident parking for at least a portion of spaces.
Homeownership vs. rental mix Members emphasized continued interest in affordable homeownership, noting earlier surveys showing strong public interest in both affordable rentals and ownership; committee speakers cited recent regional survey results showing higher response rates for rental lotteries but substantial interest in affordable home purchases. The pod recommended including some single-family/clustered ownership examples (Habitat's Route 28 project was mentioned as a relevant model) and said duplexes should be considered only if site constraints or environmental buffers reduce developable area.
Public outreach, timeline and next steps The committee and consultant intend to finalize benchmarking, circulate a cover memo and produce a simple sketch plan ("Legos"/concept sketch) for the site to accompany the public survey. The consultant team will continue benchmarking and take a closer look at building conditions for certain Mattaqueese facilities such as the gymnasium and auditorium; committee members noted demolition and hazardous-material costs were included in some estimates and will require further analysis.
Quotes "We've been talking about wanting to do public outreach for some time. And, so now we get an opportunity to finally do it," said a committee member describing the planned survey distribution on the town website and at town facilities.
"If you just use a number about 350 square feet per space that would give you a rough idea of the parking and any travel lanes," said a committee member during the parking discussion.
Ending The committee asked Barrett Planning and BSC Group to produce benchmarking memos and a sketch plan to distribute with the public survey; committee members agreed to prioritize benchmarking and complete draft materials for the Affordable Housing Trust and select-board conversations in coming weeks.
