Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Trail Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Volunteers present proposed multi-use loop trail route; commission flags steep sections and erosion concerns
Summary
Volunteers walked the proposed summit loop route, presented a GPS-derived topographic map and discussed rerouting, hardening steep sections and flagging strategy to limit premature public use.
Volunteers presented a GPS-based topographic map of a proposed summit loop trail intended as a multi-use connector and asked the commission for feedback on alignment and erosion control.
Commission member 6 handed out a paper map and told the commission, "This is my best attempt at, topographic map," and walked members through the proposed start at the summit and the red-dot connector that would finish behind the site known locally as Frog Rock. Members discussed a particularly steep crossing where the route appears to cross many contour lines; commission member 2 suggested rerouting to minimize contour crossings or consider hardening the tread at that location.
Volunteers and commissioners discussed design choices intended to control user speed where trail transitions from downhill to uphill, including a short abrupt uphill to act as a speed-control feature and planned switchbacks at steeper sections. Commission member 6 emphasized the plan aims to move some mountain-bike traffic off the loop trail and to create a directional, multi-use experience for hikers and dog walkers.
The group debated whether to flag the route in advance. Some members worried visible flagging would attract non-project users to an unfinished route; others urged a flagging date or a short window (flag the night before a scheduled walk) so volunteers can inspect and refine alignment without encouraging casual users to cut a new trail.
Volunteers said they had found most of previous flags and would reflag the route when the group agreed on a date to walk the route with the town contact, and commission member 2 said volunteers were "willing to go out and reflag it" for a guided walk. No formal permission, funding or trail construction schedule was approved at the meeting.
Commissioners asked volunteers to coordinate a flagging/walk date with staff and to bring back a revised map showing any reroutes to avoid steep contour crossings. Volunteers offered to reflag minimal sections to show alignment and to work with staff on erosion-control treatments where necessary.
