Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council updates code-enforcement wording, limits demolition reimbursements and removes automatic certified-mail requirement
Summary
The council approved ordinance changes replacing the term "dangerous buildings" with "substandard buildings," approved an interlocal cap on county demolition reimbursements, and removed a blanket requirement to send code-enforcement notices by certified mail, giving staff discretion.
Breckenridge City Council approved three items the city attorney and staff said are intended to modernize and streamline code enforcement: an ordinance replacing the phrase "dangerous buildings" with "substandard buildings," an updated Stevens County interlocal agreement capping demolition reimbursement at $20,000 annually, and an ordinance removing the requirement that the city send all code notices by certified mail.
City staff framed the language change as a clarification to reduce perceived alarm when residents receive notices. "Instead of using 'dangerous,' we're going to use 'substandard,'" the City Manager explained; the change is intended so notices do not imply imminent danger where the condition can be fixed.
On demolition funding, staff presented a revised interlocal agreement with Stevens County that caps county-funded reimbursements at $20,000 per year (structured as up to five reimbursements of $4,000 each). The council approved the updated interlocal agreement as presented.
Council members debated the mail-notification change at length. Staff said removing a blanket certified-mail requirement would save the city money: certified mail costs can be significant when hundreds of notices are sent. Code enforcement staff described a layered notification practice that includes posted notices, door tags and research tools to locate absentee owners; staff said certified mail would still be used for more serious cases (for example, imminently hazardous structures). One councilmember sought a consistent rule — for example, certified mail on a second notice — while others said staff discretion was appropriate given varying circumstances. Ultimately the ordinance removing mandatory certified mail passed on a council vote.
Council action: motions to approve the ordinances and the updated interlocal agreement were moved, seconded and carried without recorded opposition.
Implementation: staff will continue to use a mix of outreach (regular mail, door tags, posting, phone and research) and will reserve certified mail for cases where legal service certainty is required; the county interlocal provides defined reimbursement caps for demolition of substandard homes.
