Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation And Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council seeks more data on Marina Arts Village preservation vs. demolition; developer offers to split stabilization costs
Summary
Council members asked staff for more analysis about the cost, long-term maintenance, roofing/insulation options and cultural programming for the long former-Army warehouses known as the Marina Arts Village before choosing whether to accept a developer offer to split stabilization costs.
The council discussed the future of the Marina Arts Village — a long group of former Army warehouses — after a developer (Shea Homes) proposed splitting costs to stabilize the structure. The developer told the council it could provide $1.35 million toward stabilization; consultants and the developer provided preliminary estimates showing full rehabilitation could approach or exceed $2.7 million, while demolition of the middle building would cost an estimated $752,000.
Developer representative Don Hofer and others described stabilization concepts and the potential for mixed uses — arts studios, performance or museum spaces, retail or office space — and emphasized that rehabilitation of all buildings would be more expensive than a phased approach focused on priority spaces. Public comments included support from the arts community for studio/performance space and from a longtime Fort Ord resident seeking a military-history museum; other residents cautioned the city about long-term maintenance and asked for clarity on who would pay and what guarantees the city would have.
Council directed staff to gather several follow-up items: consult with local arts stakeholders (task force asked Jackie Acheson, Arts Council for Monterey County, to participate), develop a short financial briefing on where additional funds might come from and what would be sacrificed if city funds are committed, and to look at insulation/roofing approaches (the applicant provided a rigid-roof-insulation option estimate of about $715,000 for the entire structure). The council voted to defer a final decision and to return with implementation and financing options; the developer asked for certainty so sales and construction schedules could proceed if the council chose to proceed.
Ending: Council deferred any demolition or major expenditure decision, asked staff for additional analysis, and set follow-up meetings to consider a final direction.
