Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Energy broker Energetic says auctioned contracts cut Hillsborough rates as capacity costs rise
Summary
Energetic told the township committee it ran state‑approved auctions that lowered the township’s commercial electric and gas supply costs compared with prior third‑party contracts, and warned of an estimated regional capacity cost increase this summer.
Get email alerts on the Energy Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A women- and minority‑owned energy consultant told the Hillsborough Township Committee on May 13 that state‑approved electricity and natural gas auctions secured lower supply rates for township commercial meters and that the region’s capacity charge could raise bills this summer unless mitigated.
“...we will see a surge in their electric costs ... estimated that increase to be around 15%,” Energetic owner Eva Garritz told the committee, summarizing projected capacity-driven cost pressure in the PJM region and explaining how the company is advising the township to limit the impact.
Why it matters: Energetic said it has managed the township’s commercial meters since November 2022 and used an auction platform (authorized by the state) to attract competitive supply bids. The company said earlier third‑party supply rates ranged roughly from 14.5¢ to 20¢ per kilowatt-hour; Energetic’s procurement and a change in how lighting and non‑lighting meters are grouped produced lower all‑in equivalents in the company’s presentation.
Details and numbers provided: Energetic owners Eva Garritz and Kristen Tobias told the committee they procured a market‑based electric product (an index adder) that the presenter said was “locked in at 0.039,” describing that as about 4¢ per kilowatt-hour for the commodity portion and saying the all‑in, fixed equivalent for township budgeting was about 10¢ per kilowatt-hour — a figure the presenter characterized as roughly a 30% decrease from the prior contract. The consultants also said a market‑based natural gas product (a basis) was locked “just above 20¢ a therm,” which the presentation translated into an all‑in comparable for budgeting.
Actions taken: The township executed a resolution on the day of an Energetic/Taurus Advisory Group auction to put the township into the competitive auction and accept the winning supplier, the presenters said. Energetic said next steps include ongoing budget forecasting, advising on demand reduction and lighting controls, and watching commodity markets for “dips” when selective hedging could be employed.
Town response: Township staff thanked the presenters for monitoring the market and helping the municipality avoid “undue spikes.” Committee members asked for clarification about how the products work and how savings were calculated; Energetic offered to provide follow‑up materials.
Ending: Energetic urged the township to pursue continued demand‑management steps and said it would monitor market and tariff changes—including PJM capacity charges—and recommend hedging or operational changes when appropriate.

