Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sidewalks North Woodland topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident urges city to extend North Woodland sidewalks; council outlines property-owner cost responsibility
Summary
A Clyde resident asked the council to install sidewalks on North Woodland Avenue to improve pedestrian safety; city staff and council said installation is typically a property-owner responsibility though the city can assess costs or pursue a sidewalk program.
Get email alerts on the Sidewalks North Woodland topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Linda Cook, a Clyde resident, asked council to install sidewalks on North Woodland Avenue from the point where city sidewalks currently end to Route 20, saying pedestrians, families and people with strollers must walk in the roadway where sidewalks stop.
Cook described heavy pedestrian use near new businesses and named safety concerns from vehicle traffic and semis using adjacent commercial access drives. She said the current sidewalk ends at her property and that parked vehicles and driveway access force pedestrians into the street.
City staff and council described how sidewalk installation generally falls to adjacent property owners under city practice. City staff said the city has used a program in the past to force installation and spread the cost over a term (for example five years), and that the city could explore similar enforcement or assessment options; staff also offered to gather Cook’s contact information and follow up with zoning or code staff.
Why it matters: Gaps in sidewalks can create recurring pedestrian safety hazards on routes used by residents, children and customers of nearby businesses. The council said options include homeowner installation assessed to property owners, a city-forced installation program with cost-spreading, or targeted discussion about commercial setbacks and pedestrian access.
Council did not vote or direct staff to begin a specific capital project at the meeting; staff asked Cook to leave contact information so city staff can research ordinances and return with an answer about sidewalk policy and whether any prior agreements exempted specific properties.
Council members noted past practices varied by block and that the city’s sidewalk program has at times required property owners to pay; whether the city would mandate installation at this location would depend on zoning, past agreements and available staffing and resources.
