Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council staff recommend keeping city-center development-agreement option to preserve flexibility
Summary
Staff proposed reviving a city-center overlay development-agreement approach to allow council discretion on stepbacks, public benefits and design tradeoffs; council discussion focused on geographic limits and process safeguards.
City planning staff recommended maintaining a development-agreement option for Millcreek’s City Center overlay to give the council discretion to approve departures from some design standards when a proposed project delivers defined public benefits.
Assistant City Manager and Planning Director Francis Lilly told council members the updated zoning and subdivision code and a consolidated fee schedule are scheduled for council approval on April 28, with a proposed effective date of May 19 to allow staff time to update forms and the website. Lilly said the development-agreement concept — previously used for the parking structure and city-hall-adjacent projects — would allow negotiation on stepback variations, height tradeoffs and other design standards where the developer provides public benefits such as publicly accessible open space, shared parking or affordable housing.
“Development agreements give us strategic flexibility,” Lilly said, describing a public process that would include a neighborhood meeting, community council review, planning commission recommendation, and a council decision at a public meeting.
Lilly and legal staff discussed guardrails: properties north of Chambers Avenue, property fronting on 3350 South, and parcels adjacent to single-family neighborhoods and the Mount Air National Historic District would be excluded from the development-agreement flexibility. The proposed ordinance would preserve assigned standards and maximum/minimum building heights as non-modifiable.
Council members asked about legal risk and the need for “meat on the skeleton” of findings if the council exercises discretion. City legal staff (John Grama) advised that because the decision would be legislative and transparent — with findings at public hearings and planning commission review — courts typically defer to such legislative actions, provided adequate findings explain public benefits that justify deviations.
Lilly said the planning commission and the East Mill Creek Community Council had endorsed treating certain City Center modifications through a development-agreement process because it gives the city leverage to negotiate public benefits while allowing design creativity. No ordinance adoption occurred at the April 14 work session; staff will return with final ordinances on April 28 for council consideration.
