Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners reconsider Prop 1‑23 participation and flag questions about EPS economic study and PAB allocations
Summary
Routt County commissioners discussed whether to opt into Prop 1‑23 affordable‑housing funding ahead of a November deadline, questioned an EPS economic‑impact draft and flagged pending PAB (private activity bond) allocations for housing projects.
Routt County commissioners told staff on April 7 they will revisit whether the county should opt into Colorado’s Prop 1‑23 affordable‑housing program before an opt‑in deadline on Nov. 1.
The county previously opted out because of concerns about a required 3% increase in affordable housing units; county staff and a commissioner noted municipalities and housing authorities in the valley have used Prop 1‑23 funds and down‑payment assistance that cannot currently be used in unincorporated Routt County because the county is not opted in.
Commissioner Salinas volunteered to lead a follow‑up review, which would include consulting the Yampa Valley Housing Authority and municipalities about how a regional partnership could meet the 3% requirement through projects inside municipal limits. Staff said they will update housing guidelines and share a baseline of existing unincorporated affordable units to inform any decision.
Separately, commissioners criticized a draft economic study from EPS that estimated windings and economic output (the draft reported 6.7% of county economic output, using a county total that staff listed as $4.6 billion). Commissioners asked county staff and EPS to re‑examine tax‑revenue modeling and property‑value assumptions used in the report.
Staff also briefed commissioners on forthcoming Private Activity Bond (PAB) allocations that the Yampa Valley Housing Authority plans to use for a Hillside Apartments project and other allocations earmarked for Hayden employee housing projects; commissioners were notified an allocation item will likely appear on a May agenda and asked for more clarity on allocated years and municipal partnerships.
No formal vote was taken on Prop 1‑23; commissioners directed staff to conduct additional analysis and outreach and to return with recommendations in advance of the November opt‑in deadline.
