Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Roads Mag Chloride topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Routt County road crews face rising mag‑chloride prices; officials plan program scaling and reprioritization
Summary
County staff told commissioners mag‑chloride prices spiked after market consolidation and concerns about Great Salt Lake supply; Road & Bridge will model scaled back treatments and reallocate savings from paving to preserve core services.
County staff informed the board that recent bids show chip seal and striping projects are under budget but mag‑chloride — the dust‑control product used on many rural roads — has risen sharply after a supplier consolidation. EnviroTech’s acquisition of GEMCO removed a competitor, and staff said mag‑chloride sourcing from the Great Salt Lake is uncertain because of falling lake levels.
Why it matters: Mag‑chloride applications are politically sensitive (residents expect dust control on county roads). Significant price increases may force the county to change application frequency, prioritize segments, or require private developments to cover costs for non‑program roads.
Key details from staff: Commissioners were told chip seal and striping bid packages are roughly $50,000 under budget overall, but mag‑chloride bids approached previous gasoline‑equivalent prices per gallon. Road & Bridge will model program options (every‑other‑year applications on some roads, lower application rates on flatter roads or roads historically shot annually, and combining private purchases with county allocations) and return with a plan. Staff singled out a candidate road in Commissioner Corrigan’s area that might be reduced in treatment frequency because it is flat and less in need of heavier applications.
Operational notes: Staff directed Road & Bridge to produce a prioritized, scenario‑based plan that keeps the county within its overall road budget while reducing mag‑chloride application where least harmful. The plan will evaluate political sensitivity (neighborhood HOAs, key collectors) and technical factors (hills vs. flats) and propose communications to affected residents.
Next steps and public impact: The county plans an outreach and phased implementation approach to minimize surprises; commissioners asked staff to present specific dollar impacts and proposed changes in one or two weeks. Staff emphasized that some neighborhoods buy private mag‑chloride and that the county will seek to coordinate with those efforts.
Ending: Commissioners voiced concern about the affordability and environmental sustainability of mag‑chloride over the next several years and asked staff to return with tight scenarios and communications plans.
