Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Veterans Retirement Policies topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee hears House Bill 17 to let totally and permanently disabled veterans access PERS retirement earlier
Summary
House Bill 17 would allow Alaskans rated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as totally and permanently service-connected disabled to take PERS retirement if they have at least five years of credited service; the committee took testimony and set the bill aside for a future hearing.
The Senate State Affairs Committee on May 15 took testimony on House Bill 17, which would allow Alaskan public employees who are rated by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as totally and permanently disabled from a service-connected condition to take PERS retirement so long as they have at least five years of credited service.
"This bill does not create new benefits. It simply removes existing barriers so that eligible disabled veterans can retire with dignity and stability they've earned through both public and military service," Craig Valdez, chief of staff to Rep. Rauscher, told the committee. Valdez said the bill permits purchase of military service as allowed under current PERS rules to count toward the five-year minimum.
Testimony from veterans underscored the bill's purpose. Mark Weisenhundt of Palmer testified the measure recognizes hardships faced by totally and permanently disabled veterans who often struggle to maintain employment; he estimated up to 48 PERS members might be eligible though the retirement division does not track exact numbers. Austin Flavin, also of Palmer, described his military service, a subsequent diagnosis he attributes to service conditions, and his desire to access retirement benefits earlier. Both witnesses asked the committee to support the bill.
Mindy Voigt, deputy director of the Division of Retirement and Benefits, told the committee that as written "there is no cost to claim, to pay for this bill." She clarified that the bill would create an obligation for the retirement system if eligible members claim the benefit, which could increase unfunded liability for the plan: "The ultimate cost would be this plan... would pay this benefit, which would lead to unfunded liability," Voigt said.
Committee members asked for clarification about how disability would be verified; staff said the administration envisions using a VA form (DD 214 and VA rating evidence) and a 100 percent VA rating as the likely method to determine eligibility. The bill does not alter health benefits rules: retirement medical benefits remain subject to existing statutes that generally require 10 or more years of service for eligibility and early retirees would pay the full premium until they meet statutory thresholds.
No vote was taken; the committee set House Bill 17 aside for a future hearing to allow additional review and potential fiscal analysis.
