No action taken after incomplete window application at 176 Main Street

3338734 · May 11, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Because the applicant for 176 Main Street did not provide complete submission materials the commission took no action and did not vote; staff will check submission deadlines before pursuing enforcement.

The Historic District Commission took no action on an application for replacement of a two‑pane basement casement window at 176 Main Street because the applicant failed to submit complete documentation required for review.

Rosina Negron explained the property had been the subject of a prior violation and a pre-application meeting; the applicant submitted only an incomplete form and staff requested full submission materials. The commission elected not to vote and discussed whether to pursue a new violation; commissioners asked staff to verify statutory time limits before initiating enforcement.

The commission did not receive any updated documents at the hearing and decided to hold the item open pending a complete filing; if the statutory review period expires staff may place the item on a future agenda for further action or pursue enforcement if warranted.