Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Surplus Property Evaluation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors discuss evaluating former poor farm, surplus county lands for recreation or tourism uses
Summary
Board members recommended that the county economic development division evaluate a large surplus tract (the former poor farm on Donut Road) for possible historic, recreational or tourism uses, and noted historical-society interest and the potential need for an archaeological survey.
Members of the Northumberland County Board of Supervisors discussed adding a recommendation to the comprehensive plan for the county economic development division to evaluate the former poor farm and other surplus properties for potential historic, recreational or mixed-use development.
A supervisor identified the former poor farm tract near Donut Road — described in the meeting as the largest surplus parcel the board had previously reviewed — as a candidate for evaluation. The supervisor said local historical-society members believe there are graves and other artifacts on the site and recommended an archaeological survey before any development, noting the cost of such studies.
Board members described the property as isolated but potentially suitable for trails, passive recreation, or a tourism asset if archaeological and historical value justify investment. The discussion noted that previous county reviews of surplus properties had identified a short list of parcels for further consideration and that one of those parcels was already in active sale. The supervisors did not take a formal vote to transfer or rezone the parcel during this meeting; rather, the topic was discussed as a planning recommendation and possible action for the economic development division to study further.
The board also discussed county capacity for recreation programming and observed that the county currently relies on allocations to local providers (including the YMCA) rather than operating an in-house recreation department. Several supervisors said they support further study so that surplus land is not simply left unused, and recommended that any evaluation include historic-architecture or archaeological review and cost estimates for remediation or conversion into trails or other low-impact uses.
Historical-society members were reported to be interested in the property and likely to be vocal in any future proceedings. Supervisors suggested adding the recommendation to the plan so the economic development division can examine options and report back to the board at a future meeting.
