Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sierraville residents, law enforcement urge Caltrans not to raise speeds on Highways 49/89
Summary
At a Sierra County public hearing, residents, the sheriff and CHP urged Caltrans to keep or lower posted speeds through Sierraville and recommended nonlegislative mitigations after Caltrans' traffic survey recommended raising some limits.
Get email alerts on the Traffic Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Sierraville residents, county officials and law enforcement told Caltrans at a public hearing that proposed increases to speed limits on state Highways 49 and 89 would compromise safety for pedestrians, school buses, driveways and wildlife.
Sierra County Director of Transportation Brian Davies said Caltrans' recent engineering traffic surveys found the 85th-percentile speeds exceed the posted limits and proposed raising a 35 mph zone to 40 mph and removing a 45 mph zone approaching Sierraville. Davies read findings from the 2018 task force that prompted state reforms but said the laws that allow local adjustments largely exclude the state highway system. “The current speed surveys for Sierraville are expired and have been expired for a number of years,” Davies said. “So right now, you don't actually have speed zones. You have speed signs, and they're not enforceable.”
The nut graf: Residents and local safety officials said the proposed increases would heighten risks on a stretch that functions as the town’s main street — with narrow shoulders, closely spaced driveways, pedestrian activity, school bus stops and frequent wildlife crossings — and urged Caltrans to retain or reduce limits and pursue other engineering or enforcement measures.
Sheriff Mike Fisher described decades of local patrol experience and pointed to hidden driveways, parked cars at the white line, pedestrians crossing to businesses and an active school bus stop. “The current speed limit in Sierraville is appropriate, that that 35 mile an hour,” Fisher said, and warned that a higher posted speed would increase stopping distances and collision risk. California Highway Patrol Lieutenant Pedersen said CHP and local deputies have run targeted enforcement and will “enforce the speed aggressively,” and reported an enforcement detail that produced citations in recent weeks.
Marsha Borkova, Caltrans Traffic Safety Branch chief, told attendees the agency recognizes local frustration and is seeking ways to lower travel speeds while staying within legal constraints. She outlined a potential use of “transition zones” that would place warning signs so drivers see the lower speed approaching town even if the zone is technically unenforceable under the survey rules. “We do realize the frustration... it is a broken system that we're dealing with,” Borkova said.
Residents described near misses, pets and wildlife hit on the road, children near the highway, and gaps in continuous sidewalks. Multiple speakers asked for a 25 mph limit through the most residential block on South Lincoln Street, crosswalks, flashing speed feedback signs and improved signage approaching town. County staff and supervisors said the county has already submitted a formal comment letter and will forward the public record to Caltrans; county staff also encouraged community proposals for sidewalk and crosswalk grant applications.
Caltrans and legislative staff said the issue has statewide dimensions and legislative remedies may be needed to give local agencies more authority over state highway speed zones. Representatives from Senator Megan Dahle’s and Assemblywoman Heather Haspel’s offices attended and acknowledged the limits of current law; one assembly representative noted that mitigation and limited statutory adjustments (on the order of several miles per hour) are available but that larger changes would require legislation.
What happens next: Caltrans will accept the written comments and testimony on the record and will review them before issuing a final decision. County officials and attendees were advised to submit letters and petitions; the county will forward submitted comments to Caltrans. No formal local vote or ordinance change was recorded at the hearing.
Ending: Speakers repeatedly asked Caltrans to use discretion and to pursue on-the-ground mitigations — crosswalks, signage, enforcement funding and connected sidewalks — while the legislative process is pursued to change how state highway speed zones are set.
