Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Semiconductors topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Semiconductor industry urges targeted trade strategy, investment and workforce steps to sustain U.S. lead

3316117 · May 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Semiconductor Industry Association told the Senate Finance Committee that broad tariffs could raise costs for chipmakers and urged targeted exemptions, expanded tax credits, increased R&D and workforce development to protect U.S. competitiveness and the CHIPS‑era investments.

Semiconductor industry leaders told the Senate Finance Committee on May 14, 2025, that targeted trade measures, not blanket tariffs, are needed to preserve U.S. competitiveness as domestic chip manufacturing expands under CHIPS‑era investments.

David Isaacs, vice president for government affairs at the Semiconductor Industry Association, said the industry has announced “investments of over $540,000,000,000 in dozens of projects in 28 states” and warned that a leading‑edge fabrication plant can cost “as much as 20 to $30,000,000,000.” He added that “over 70% of our sales are overseas” and that access to global markets is necessary to sustain the capital and R&D intensity of the sector.

Isaacs told senators that broad tariffs on inputs and equipment could “increase the cost of critical inputs in American manufacturing and therefore weaken the competitiveness of the U.S. industry.” He recommended a pro‑growth package: extend and strengthen the advanced manufacturing investment tax credit (including adding chip research and design), increase R&D funding, invest in workforce and STEM, streamline permitting and regulatory processes for fabs, and pursue trade strategies to increase market access, including sectoral agreements for semiconductors.

Members raised concerns about tariffs affecting fab equipment and other sophisticated imported inputs; Isaacs noted that a large share of fab equipment costs are imported and urged strategic, phased exemptions for critical inputs. Senators discussed building domestic capacity while maintaining secure access to allied suppliers and export‑control coordination for national security purposes.

No committee votes occurred; witnesses emphasized a mix of domestic investment and targeted trade policy rather than broad import duties.