Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Amtrak Board Nomination And Oversight topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Amtrak nominee Robert Gleason pledges expansion support, transparency after senators raise cost and fraud concerns
Summary
Robert Gleason, nominated to Amtrak’s board of directors, told the Senate Commerce Committee he supports expanding passenger rail to underserved communities and pledged oversight of spending and executive compensation after senators cited cost overruns, a recent Amtrak OIG fraud probe, and concerns over layoffs.
Get email alerts on the Amtrak Board Nomination And Oversight topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Robert Gleason, the nominee to serve on Amtrak’s board of directors, told the Senate Commerce Committee he will push for expanded long‑distance and state corridor service, greater board transparency and fiscal responsibility, while senators raised cost and fraud concerns tied to Amtrak projects.
Sen. Gary Peters and others asked whether Gleason would ensure Amtrak spends federal funds efficiently and oversee executive compensation tied to measurable metrics such as ridership, revenue and safety. Peters pointed to a recent internal investigation by Amtrak’s Office of Inspector General that uncovered a $12,000,000 health‑care fraud scheme involving 119 employees and said Congress expects vigilant stewardship of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funds. Gleason replied: “I would have it no other way.”
Gleason emphasized his long record in transportation and community service in Pennsylvania and said passenger rail can “drive prosperity” for towns that regain service. Multiple senators asked for commitments to long‑distance routes and regional projects; Gleason pledged to support improving and expanding service in a “fiscally responsible manner” and said he supports more board transparency and efficient use of taxpayer funds.
Senators also sought assurances about planned management cuts at Amtrak and potential impacts on service; Gleason said he was not yet on the board and could not speak to personnel decisions, but he promised to seek transparency on rationale and service impacts if confirmed.
The hearing included no final vote; senators signaled follow‑up questions for the record.
