Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Timeline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews election timeline and legal requirements for charter amendments
Summary
Commission staff walked members through constitutional and statutory deadlines for placing charter amendments on the ballot, Board of Elections filing rules, the requirement to provide full amendment text at polling places, and certification and contest periods following the vote.
The Charter Review Commission reviewed the election timetable and legal requirements the city must follow if City Council places the commission’s proposed charter amendments on the ballot.
Rebecca (staff member) walked commissioners through the sequence of constitutional and statutory references that determine deadlines, starting with “Article 18, Section 9” and its cross-reference to Section 8, then the Board of Elections’ filing timetable and the requirement to provide full copies of the amendments at polling places.
Rebecca said the charter and state rules together create a timeline: council readings and any ballot placement must meet the charter’s July 1 timing requirement for actions, and state law imposes filing deadlines such as a generally applicable 90-day pre-election filing requirement with the Board of Elections and related certification windows. She told the commission, “The statute requires that you have full copy of the amendments at each polling place,” and noted the city previously decided to mail amendment information to electors rather than rely solely on newspaper publication and website postings.
Staff explained the certification process after the election: local officials receive a certificate of the result (a process the staff described as having multiple statutory timing provisions and exceptions), and that certificate’s date starts a 15-day contest period during which electors may file challenges limited to procedural issues (for example whether polling places opened or ballots were properly processed), not the substantive wisdom of an amendment. Rebecca summarized: “You have this deadline to certify to secretary of state, and you may not know if you have a good election.”
Commissioners asked whether commission members would be expected to attend City Council readings; staff said council could request commission members to attend, but there is no requirement for the commission to be formally present as a group. Staff said most implementation tasks — preparing materials, coordinating with the Board of Elections, mailings, publications and filings — will be handled by city staff and the City Council’s legislative process.
Commissioners were advised to expect further communications about the Council reading schedule and Board of Elections coordination as the city advances the package toward the November election timeline.
