Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 911 Consoles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Daniels County presses Motorola, state over ownership and financing of repurposed 9-1-1 consoles
Summary
County officials raised legal and financial questions after the state offered repurposed Motorola dispatch consoles and Motorola proposed upgrades. Vendors said the original offer stands; county attorney will review contracts before finalizing financing and accepting state maintenance commitments.
Get email alerts on the 911 Consoles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Daniels County commissioners spent a large portion of their April 21 meeting pressing vendors and the state for written clarity on who will own and maintain repurposed Motorola dispatch consoles the county is buying and financing.
The county was offered two remanufactured Motorola MCC 7500 dispatch positions that the state had acquired, then returned to Motorola for upgrades. Vendor Redtail Communications’ representative Brian said the state and Motorola are not retracting the original offer, and that Motorola provided credits and discounts that reduced the county’s cost. “Nobody’s backing off on what they had originally offered,” Brian said during a conference call included in the meeting record.
Why it matters: the county borrowed to pay the county share of upgrades and is concerned that contract language in an interlocal agreement with the State of Montana calls the consoles state-owned. County Attorney Logan Olson said the county’s worry is practical: if the county is financing the upgraded consoles and relying on them as collateral, language giving the state ownership — even if intended to secure long-term maintenance and upgrades — could create a mismatch that might put the county’s financing at risk or complicate warranties and service commitments.
Details provided by Redtail’s representative showed the finance math behind Motorola’s offer: Motorola gave a credit for the state equipment and applied additional discounts, and the county’s contract includes an equipment upgrade line the county is paying. Brian described a roughly $90,005.31 credit for the state equipment plus other discounts, and said Daniels County’s out‑of‑pocket financing amounts to roughly tens of thousands per console after the credits. Brian and other vendor contacts repeatedly told the county that the upgrade and maintenance support the state offers remain part of the original deal.
County officials and the vendor agreed on next steps in the meeting: the Daniels County attorney will review the Motorola purchase/loan paperwork and the state interlocal agreement, and the county will request a joint call that includes the county attorney, Motorola and the state attorney to resolve the drafting conflict. Brian encouraged the county to present specific contract language questions in writing. ‘‘If the county attorney has an issue with this and they need us to change something, just have them send me an email with what they need to change,’’ he said.
Commissioners also indicated they would proceed with the scheduled initial payment to Motorola to avoid an immediate contract default while the county attorney and state counsel try to clear the ownership wording. At the meeting one vendor representative summarized the immediate recommendation: the county should make the contract payment to keep the implementation on schedule while legal review proceeds.
County officials said they will not sign anything that creates a documented legal mismatch with the county’s financing without the county attorney’s clearance. A follow-up meeting with the state’s counsel and Motorola was recommended to document how maintenance, upgrades, ownership and collateral will operate going forward.
The discussion spanned vendor, state and county staff calls recorded in the public meeting; commissioners asked for a written response from Motorola and the state addressing whether state ownership language would affect the county’s financed collateral or trigger loan acceleration or other unintended consequences. The county also asked the vendors to confirm in writing that previously described upgrade and maintenance commitments would remain if contract language is changed for the interlocal agreement.
The issue affects emergency communications, county finances and long‑term upgrade paths for the county’s 9‑1‑1 dispatch positions. Commissioners directed county staff to schedule the county‑attorney‑led review and the joint call with vendor and state counsel and to proceed with contract payments that prevent immediate default while legal review is underway.

