Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Election Integrity topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Voter surveillance concerns: resident urges public test and transparency for ES&S tabulators

3308844 · May 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A citizen told commissioners she found discrepancies in public test reports for ES&S tabulators and urged the county to run hand-count comparison tests and make results available to the public; she cited observed differences between the tabulator reports and hand counts in documents she reviewed.

During public comment at the Cascade County commission meeting, Colleen Stewart raised concerns about transparency and accuracy of local election tabulation procedures and called for publicly run comparison tests between electronic tabulators and hand counts.

Stewart identified herself and said the county uses an ES&S 950 tabulator to count paper ballots. She said she reviewed public-test reports and hand-count records and described numerical discrepancies. “The public test shows 486 votes cast… however, the hand count of that … shows 405 total,” Stewart said, summarizing the difference reported in documents she reviewed. She told the commissioners she was denied access to view some of the test results when she attempted to observe and urged the county to run a public test using a test deck representing all 26 precincts so that hand counts can be compared with tabulator results.

Stewart said she is not focused on election winners or party outcomes but on verifying that “the machine is counting the ballots correctly by comparing the results from the electronic tabulator with the hand counted results.” She urged that such public tests be conducted and made available so voters can verify tabulator accuracy. The transcript records Stewart’s allegations and requests as public comment; it does not record any response from election officials in the provided excerpt.