Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Building Maintenance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

HLC approves courthouse flooring restoration project at 860 N. Rio Vista Road

3307742 · May 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved a certificate of appropriateness to restore and replace flooring at the Socorro Municipal Courthouse, aiming to match existing chambers hardwood and replace ceramic tile and carpeting with matching hardwood. City council and the city manager have provided funds for the project.

The Socorro Historical Landmark Commission on May 14 approved a certificate of appropriateness authorizing restoration of existing hardwood flooring, removal and replacement of ceramic tile, and installation of new hardwood to match adjacent areas at the Socorro Municipal Courthouse, 860 North Rio Vista Road.

City staff said the project intends to match the largest existing room (chambers) and refurbish or replace boards as needed so the flooring is uniform throughout foyers, walkways and restrooms. The presentation explained that some areas currently have birch, oak or carpet, and that ceramic tile would be replaced where original wood is not present.

Staff noted that the city manager and city council have allocated funds to permit the work and that a cost analysis showed the area needing replacement is not as large as the full building area. Staff said the goal is to sand, refinish and glaze existing boards and match new pieces to the existing wood so the new portions "look old" and flow with the original flooring.

Commissioner Elizabeth Ponce Lugo moved to approve the COA; Jesse Montelongo seconded. Rafael Padilla, Dr. Elizabeth Ponce Lugo, David Estrada and Jesse Montelongo voted "aye," and the motion carried.

Staff said additional restroom work may be considered next fiscal year but no promises were made; follow-up permitting and procurement steps were implied.