Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Flood Control topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates using flood control carryforward for local road fix‑ups; possible revenue and project tradeoffs
Summary
Supervisors discussed redirecting part of the Flood Control District’s cash carryforward to smaller road and culvert projects while weighing the revenue and long‑term project implications.
Supervisors raised the status of the Flood Control District cash balance and discussed redirecting some of that money toward localized road and culvert projects during the May 14 budget work session.
County staff reported a flood control cash carryforward of approximately $7,000,000 in the current fiscal year. A supervisor noted that reducing the flood control district tax rate to zero would remove about $2,600,000 in annual revenue, and suggested instead using existing carryforward dollars for targeted fixes such as culverts or road protection in problem washes.
The conversation included discussion of long‑term, multimillion‑dollar flood control projects that the district has prioritized and the cost of repeated outside hydrology studies. Supervisors questioned whether some smaller, lower‑cost interventions would provide practical flood‑hardening and road protection while avoiding repeated high‑cost studies and large capital projects.
Staff said there are planned meetings of the flood control working group to reprioritize projects and review cash balances. No formal change to the flood control tax rate or project list was adopted at the May 14 session; supervisors asked staff for more detail on cash‑carryforward accounting and project prioritization before any decision.
