Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

James Monroe Park renovation bids come in far above earlier engineer estimate; council told market drove costs

3305576 · January 7, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council staff told residents that bids for James Monroe Park improvements returned between about $2.04 million and $2.7 million, significantly higher than an earlier engineer's estimate of $1.528 million; the project includes new concession stand, ADA restrooms, commercial septic, well and site improvements.

A long-planned renovation of James Monroe Park in Monroe Township drew questions on Jan. 6 after residents asked how the project escalated from the original engineer’s estimate to a higher set of contractor bids.

Town staff and the township engineer explained that the original estimate of $1,528,000 dated from roughly two years earlier and served only as an estimate. When the project was bid this cycle, project specifications included 77 bid items with several lump-sum line items. The township received six bids; the lowest was about $2,037,000 and bids rose to approximately $2,700,000. Staff said the bids were consistent with current market pricing and a roughly 5% step between the lowest and subsequent bidders.

Project scope described by staff includes replacement of the existing concession stand and restrooms with a new building that will contain ADA-compliant restrooms and an updated concession area; a commercial septic system sized to handle the building and future site improvements (including grease traps); new water service and a new well to address intermittent low water supply at current well; ADA-compliant walking-path improvements; and electrical upgrades.

Staff noted the engineer’s estimate is not shared with bidders before bidding and that the estimate primarily serves as a planning benchmark; final contract awards will follow established procurement procedures and the item will appear on the regular meeting agenda for formal action.

Ending: Staff said the project has been under development for about two-and-a-half years and that the bid results reflect current market conditions; the contract award and next procurement steps will be handled at the council’s regular meeting.