Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Fees And Transportation Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Larimer County staff propose July cost-of-living increases for building fees and a 4.44% catch-up for transportation expansion fees

3299946 · May 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County building-permit and development-review fees will rise 2.27% on July 1 under existing authorization; engineers proposed a 4.44% Transportation Capital Expansion Fee (TCEF) increase to ‘catch up’ from last year's partial adoption and to fund road projects; staff will place the items on the consent agenda.

Larimer County staff told the Board of County Commissioners on May 12 that building permit and planning and engineering development-review fees will increase by 2.27% effective July 1 under existing board authorizations, and that staff are proposing a 4.44% catch-up increase to Transportation Capital Expansion Fees tied to the Colorado Department of Transportation construction-cost index.

Eric Fried, Larimer County building official, said the board authorized annual cost-of-living adjustments for building fees in February 2008 and that a December 2023 board action extended the same annual CPI-based adjustment to planning and engineering development-review fees. Fried said last year’s regional consumer price index change was 2.27%, and staff plan to implement that adjustment on July 1.

Mark Peterson, county engineer, and Steven Rothwell, Larimer County Engineering, explained TCEF calculations and recommended a 4.44% increase to recover a roughly 7% “deficiency” that resulted after the board adopted a smaller increase last year instead of the full index-calculated change. Rothwell said the county uses the CDOT construction cost index and an eight-quarter moving average; when the board adopted a 10% increase last year instead of a 17% index result, the county accrued a catch-up gap. Peterson said the TCEF revenue funds capital road projects rather than salaries.

Officials provided financial context. Peterson told commissioners the county typically collects about $1,300,000 in total fees (development-related fees) and that adopting the smaller increase last year reduced revenue by roughly $100,000 relative to the full index calculation. Staff gave an example showing a single-family home in the cited square-footage band would see a $294 increase in fees if the board adopts the 4.44% TCEF change.

Peterson and Rothwell recommended implementing the 4.44% catch-up now and completing a full reassessment of the capital expansion fee calculations later this year. Commissioners expressed support for catching up, noting prior-year concerns about property tax reappraisals and that the fees fund road capacity projects. One commissioner noted CDOT cut about $200 million from statewide transportation funds this year, underscoring local funding needs.

Staff said the building and development-review fee adjustments and the TCEF change will be presented on the consent agenda in the coming weeks; no final vote occurred at the work session.