Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elections Registrar topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shasta County meeting erupts over next registrar; residents urge internal appointment
Summary
Public commenters and several supervisors pressed the Board of Supervisors about the April 30 special meeting to appoint a new Registrar of Voters, with many urging promotion of long-time elections staffer Joanna Francesca and others raising concerns about past elections administration and transparency.
The Shasta County Board of Supervisors heard a flood of public comments on April 22 as the board prepared for a special meeting April 30 to appoint the county’s next Registrar of Voters.
Supporters of Joanna Francesca, who has 16 years in the county elections office and served as assistant registrar, urged the board to promote from within. “Please do listen to these very thoughtful constituents who have come before you in times past and appoint Joanna Francesca,” said Jenny (public commenter), who described Francesca as “steadfast” and experienced.
The debate broadened: other residents told the board they had concerns about past elections operations and transparency in the Registrar’s Office. Laura Hobbs, a public commenter who described alleged procedural problems with voting equipment and record-keeping, cited California election law and urged the supervisors to consider those matters when making their selection. “If you do not want change, don’t change anything,” said Thomas H., arguing for stricter observation and clearer chain-of-custody procedures.
Why it matters: the registrar oversees voter rolls, vote processing and the county’s compliance with state election law. Several speakers linked those duties to public trust in election results and asked the board to weigh both experience and integrity in the appointment.
What the board said and did - Several supervisors acknowledged the volume of public concern and discussed process details in closed and open sessions. Supervisor Plummer and others asked for the list of finalists; Supervisor Plummer encouraged disclosure of the five finalists and urged public attendance at the April 30 special meeting, tentatively set for 11 a.m. - The board did not make an appointment at the April 22 meeting; the selection remains scheduled for April 30.
Public comments and themes - Pro-promotion: Multiple commenters backed Joanna Francesca for her long service and training of other staff. “She has trained the last two elections,” a supporter said. - Transparency and procedures: Other speakers cited specific concerns about ballot handling, audit logs and public observation; one commenter urged the board to require adherence to the California Election Code and called for more transparent records and auditable logs. - Legal, factual disputes: Several commenters asserted facts about past elections and media coverage; others said those claims should be tested through records and sworn testimony.
Board context and next steps - The board confirmed it will hold a special meeting April 30 to decide the next Registrar of Voters. Supervisors and staff emphasized that the appointment process must follow state law and the county’s practices for appointments. - The clerk’s office and county counsel will post the finalized time and agenda for the April 30 meeting. Members of the public who want to observe or speak should follow the clerk’s published speaker request procedures.
Ending The issue is scheduled for formal action at the April 30 special meeting; supervisors urged residents to review materials and attend. The board did not vote on a registrar appointment at the April 22 session.
