Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves Stonewall Estate subdivision near County Road 23 with conditions

3299845 · April 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a short presentation by staff and applicant, Larimer County commissioners approved a four‑lot preliminary plat (Stonewall Estate) north of the CR 6/CR 23 intersection; staff will verify drainage and require standard disclosures and a road‑maintenance agreement.

Larimer County commissioners voted 3‑0 April 20 to approve the Stonewall Estate preliminary plat, a proposed subdivision that would divide an existing roughly 19.97‑acre parcel into four single‑family lots in the RR2 rural residential zoning district.

Staff summary and record: Senior planner Samantha Mott told the board the applicant proposes three new single‑family lots plus the existing home lot, with a new 40‑foot access road along the north edge of the parcel and shared access points off County Road 23. Little Thompson Water District would supply water and each lot would use on‑site septic systems. The planning commission recommended approval by a 7‑0 vote; county staff found the application met the applicable subdivision and development standards subject to the conditions in the staff report.

Key points and conditions: Engineering and applicant representatives told the board the relocated access point to the north was selected to maximize sight distance at a curved section of CR 23 and to address fire‑district and public‑safety concerns. A road maintenance agreement will be required because the new right‑of‑way will be publicly recorded but privately maintained by the lot owners. Staff also noted a preliminary drainage analysis and geotechnical report are on file; the county will require any additional percolation or drainage certification at final plat if needed, and disclosure language will be recorded to notify future buyers of site conditions.

Speakers [{"name":"Samantha Mott","role_title":"Senior Planner, Larimer County Planning Department","affiliation_type":"government","affiliation_name":"Larimer County","first_reference":{"timecode":"04:52:32","transcript_line_range":[17556,17571]}},{"name":"Joel Siemens","role_title":"Civil Engineer, Rocky Ridge Veil Engineering (applicant representative)","affiliation_type":"business","affiliation_name":"Rocky Ridge Veil Engineering","first_reference":{"timecode":"05:09:16","transcript_line_range":[18556,18573]}}]

Authorities [{"type":"policy","name":"Larimer County Land Use Code, Article 6 (subdivision preliminaries) and Article 4 (development standards)","citation":"Larimer County Land Use Code, Articles 4 & 6","referenced_by":["staff report"]}]

Actions [{"kind":"motion","identifiers":{"agenda_item_id":"Stonewall-Estate-21Land4194"},"motion":"Approve Stonewall Estate subdivision preliminary plat subject to staff conditions","mover":"Commissioner Shattuck McNally","second":"not specified","vote_record":[{"member":"Commissioner Shattuck McNally","vote":"yes"},{"member":"Commissioner Cavallos","vote":"yes"},{"member":"Commissioner Kefalas","vote":"yes"}],"tally":{"yes":3,"no":0,"abstain":0},"outcome":"approved","notes":"Standard final plat requirements (road maintenance agreement, drainage certs, recorded disclosures)."}]

Clarifying details [{"category":"water_service","detail":"Water service to be provided by Little Thompson Water District; sewer by on‑lot septic systems","source_speaker":"Samantha Mott"},{"category":"road_maintenance","detail":"New 40‑foot wide access road will be recorded in public right‑of‑way and privately maintained by lot owners via a road maintenance agreement at final plat","source_speaker":"Joel Siemens"}]

proper_names [{"name":"Stonewall Estate","type":"program"},{"name":"Little Thompson Water District","type":"agency"},{"name":"County Road 23","type":"location"}]

community_relevance":{"geographies":["Berthoud area, Larimer County"],"funding_sources":[],"impact_groups":["nearby rural residents","future lot owners"]},

meeting_context":{"engagement_level":{"speakers_count":3,"duration_minutes":35,"items_count":1},"implementation_risk":"low","history":[{"date":"2025-04-20","note":"Preliminary plat approved by Planning Commission (7-0) and Board of County Commissioners (3-0)."}]},

searchable_tags":["subdivision","Stonewall Estate","Little Thompson Water District"],

provenance":{"transcript_segments":[{"block_id":"17552.629","local_start":0,"local_end":120,"evidence_excerpt":"Good evening, everybody. Samantha Mott, senior planner. I am presenting to you the Stonewall Estate subdivision, file Number 21, Land 4194.","global_start":17552,"global_end":17672,"tc_start":"03:52:32","tc_end":"03:54:32","reason_code":"topicintro"},{"block_id":"19561.4","local_start":0,"local_end":80,"evidence_excerpt":"I move that the Board of County Commissioners approve, the Stonewall Estate subdivision file number 21DashLAND4190 subject to the conditions as outlined by staff.","global_start":19550,"global_end":19590,"tc_start":"03:55:50","tc_end":"03:56:30","reason_code":"topicfinish"}]},

salience":{"overall":0.25,"overall_justification":"Routine subdivision approval in a rural residential zone; local interest from adjacent property owners but limited broader impact.","impact_scope":"local","impact_scope_justification":"Applies to a single parcel and adjacent neighbors.","attention_level":"low","attention_level_justification":"Limited public comment and standard engineering review.","novelty":0.10,"novelty_justification":"Typical four‑lot subdivision in rural zone.","timeliness_urgency":0.20,"timeliness_urgency_justification":"Standard procedural item with technical reviews to follow.","legal_significance":0.10,"legal_significance_justification":"Standard land division under county code.","budgetary_significance":0.00,"budgetary_significance_justification":"No notable county expenditure."} ,