Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Commentations And Recognitions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
San Luis Obispo County supervisors approve commendation for longtime commenter despite objections
Summary
The Board of Supervisors voted 3-2 to adopt a resolution thanking longtime public commenter Mike Brown for his years of public service after a heated debate over his record of divisive remarks and prior employment settlements.
The San Luis Obispo County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday approved a resolution commending Mike Brown for his years of public comment and engagement, rejecting calls from some supervisors to withhold the recognition because of past controversial statements and a prior employment settlement.
Supervisor Gibson urged colleagues to oppose the resolution, citing what he described as repeated breaches of the county’s civility standards and referencing a past Santa Barbara County settlement of $925,000 related to harassment claims. “This individual has a long history of providing misinformation and frankly false information,” Gibson said during the board discussion.
Supporters said the resolution recognizes Mr. Brown’s long record of public participation but does not imply agreement with everything he has said. Supervisor Pashong invoked the board’s code of civility and argued that recognizing service does not require endorsement of all views: “We will invite and consider different perspectives, allowing space for ideas to be expressed, opposed, and clarified in a constructive manner,” she said.
The motion to adopt the resolution was made and seconded during the meeting and passed on a roll call vote, 3 in favor and 2 opposed. The board did not adopt any additional disciplinary or policy changes related to public comment at this session.
The debate exposed a split on the dais about how the county should balance free speech, civility, and the desirability of honoring frequent public participants. Supervisors who opposed the resolution said they worried about setting a precedent of honoring divisive paid lobbyists or commentators; supporters stressed protecting robust public discourse even when it is uncomfortable.
The board moved on without further formal action on rules for presentations or staff guidance; several supervisors said they plan to pursue a written policy in a future meeting to clarify when the board will place recognition items on the agenda.
