Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Taxes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors hear assessor update; staff to explore tax‑deferral options after spike in assessed values
Summary
The assessor reported ongoing appeals and declined-value reviews; supervisors directed staff to evaluate deferred‑tax options and promised further public outreach as many property owners received large assessment increases following the Dixie Fire and subsequent market adjustments.
Plumas County supervisors on March 4 received an update from the assessor’s office on recent assessment changes, current appeals and a pending state assessment practices review.
Assessor Cindy Groggett told the board staff are processing declines in values, field visits and a set of roughly 44 active appeals for the 2024 roll, some of which have been withdrawn and several of which have been adjusted. Groggett said the county’s 2017 assessment practices review identified only minor recommendations and a new review is anticipated this fall.
Several residents and supervisors described steep increases in assessed values on recent tax notices and asked whether the county could allow more gradual adjustments or administrative relief. County legal counsel and staff reported they had researched the code and said the county follows state law (including Proposition 8 mechanisms for declining values and the assessment process). Staff also told the board there are administrative deferment options and additional local measures the treasurer and auditor can evaluate to relieve short‑term payer hardship.
The treasurer and auditor said they had provided earlier cautions about how reassessments and the county’s cashflow obligations interact with other county spending, and requested time to develop a structured deferment or affordability response. The board directed county counsel, the treasurer and the auditor to examine formal deferment options and report back with proposals. Supervisors said they want to ensure residents receive clear notice about appeals processes and timelines before the April property tax payment deadline.
No formal policy change was adopted; the board asked staff to return with administrative options and recommendations for short‑term relief and communications planning so property owners understand appeal procedures and payment timing.
