Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Infrastructure topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

County says it is reviewing ENGIE NG project contract and lighting/HVAC work; board asks for clearer contract review

3299498 · March 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors heard an operational update on the countyENGIE energy services project (lighting, HVAC, solar and generators) and directed staff and counsel to review the contract, financing and reported change orders before the board takes further action.

Plumas County supervisors received an update on the so‑called NG projecta county energy services contract that includes lighting upgrades, HVAC, solar and generatorsand asked counsel and finance staff to provide a contract review and cash‑flow analysis before the board proceeds further.

Nick (Facilities) and county staff told supervisors that lighting upgrades were underway in the courthouse and that project subcontractors have been submitting equipment submittals and that crews are working on site. Staff and supervisors expressed concern about complaints the county has received about lighting brightness and other installation issues; facilities requested work orders from departments so the contractor can address specific problems.

Board members and staff said they expect county counsel and the auditor/treasurer to review the ENGIE contract and financing because the project uses two financing mechanisms and involves multiple change orders. Counsel and financing advisors are in contact with bonded financing counsel and public finance advisors, according to the update; staff said a fuller report on contract terms, cash flow and any options available to the county will be brought back to the board at a later meeting.

Why it matters: Supervisors said they want clarity on how the county committed funds, how many of the project components have been invoiced and paid, and what options the county has before making additional commitments. Several supervisors asked that the item return to the board for follow‑up in April.

Ending

Staff said they would schedule a follow‑up presentation and provide contract and finance analyses to help the board determine next steps and to identify remedies for any installation or warranty issues raised by departments.