Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tree Removal Private Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Variance board permits removal of live oak at San Miguel site after arborist findings

3299407 · May 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board approved removal of one grand live oak at 4408 West San Miguel Street after city and applicant arborists found limited root structure and construction impacts that would harm the tree's viability.

The City of Tampa Variance Review Board voted May 13 to allow removal of one grand live oak at 4408 West San Miguel Street to permit construction of a new single-family residence, after hearing arborist reports and alternate site plans.

Why it matters: The site contains multiple preservation-quality grand trees. The petitioner presented alternative lot layouts and said their design team had tried to save as many grands as possible. Natural resources staff and the applicant—s arborist both documented limited root structure and structural concerns around the subject tree; air-spade probing found few roots on the lean side and a long limb that would likely require removal and further weaken the tree.

Details: The tree is a Quercus virginiana (live oak) with a DBH around 35–40 inches. The applicant—s team showed alternate site plans: one that preserved the front tree but would impact rear specimen trees, and another that shifted the footprint but still caused construction impacts to multiple grands. The senior forester reviewed the data and judged the tree condition to be Category C-8 (one grade below removal threshold), with limited prognosis under construction stress.

Board action and rationale: Board members weighed neighborhood preservation concerns against arborist findings. The board—s motion cited the professional evaluation that the tree—s root and limb condition made survival unlikely if construction proceeded and noted the applicant was saving four of six grand trees on the lot. Based on the city—s six-factor tree-removal test (Section 27-284.20.5), the board approved removal with mitigation conditions.

Community voices: A long-time neighbor, Warren Miller, spoke strongly against removal, saying the trees had been part of the neighborhood canopy for decades. Another resident recounted a nearby storm-damage experience and urged caution about large-oak removals. The board acknowledged the neighborhood—s views but pointed to the arborist evidence and the mitigation plan.

Next steps: The applicant will follow mitigation requirements specified by Natural Resources and proceed with permit work and construction sequencing that limits impacts on the remaining preserved trees.