Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wildlife Reintroduction Wolves topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners ask staff to prepare for study on wolf reintroduction impacts; $60,000 supplement discussed and tabled
Summary
Garfield County commissioners discussed soliciting a biologist and an economist to assess local biological and socioeconomic impacts from state wolf reintroduction. Staff proposed a $60,000 professional‑services supplement; commissioners asked for further discussion and executive session rather than immediate approval.
The Garfield County Board of County Commissioners on Monday reviewed staff proposals to hire independent experts to analyze biological and socioeconomic impacts from the planned reintroduction of wolves in western Colorado.
County administration presented two draft scopes of work — one seeking a wildlife biologist to assess likely biological impacts within Garfield County, the other seeking an economist to model potential socioeconomic consequences. Staff requested a $60,000 supplement to the board’s professional services budget to fund the solicitations and analyses (roughly $30,000 per consultant, based on prior similar county efforts).
Commissioners pressed staff to clarify the expected deliverables and the purpose of the work: whether the analysis would support potential legal or administrative challenges, inform mitigation or budget planning, or simply document projected effects. Staff said the studies would provide a written, technical basis describing likely impacts observed in other jurisdictions and estimating the magnitude and potential costs if similar impacts occur locally.
Several commissioners expressed frustration with the state-level process that led to reintroduction and said they wanted more time to consider options. One commissioner asked whether the county might later pursue legal remedies; staff said studies would create a factual record the county could use for multiple purposes, including administrative or legal reviews. The board did not approve the funding request on the spot.
Instead, commissioners directed staff to schedule further discussion in an executive session to clarify scope, objectives and follow-on options before committing county dollars. Staff said they will prepare the final scopes for competitive solicitation through procurement and will return with a recommended process and timeline after the executive-session discussion.
Ending: The board paused the immediate $60,000 appropriation request and asked staff to provide revised scopes and an executive-session briefing before any procurement or spending.
