Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Probation Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves cleanup to probation revocation rules, removes automatic revocation for some misdemeanor offenses
Summary
Senate Judiciary C reported House Bill 214 favorably after sponsors said the bill corrects an unintended automatic probation revocation for possession of drug paraphernalia and narrows situations that require mandatory revocation.
Get email alerts on the Probation Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Senate Judiciary C committee voted to report House Bill 214 favorably after lawmakers said the bill corrects drafting errors in probation revocation rules and restores judicial discretion in many technical violation cases.
Representative Vilio, the sponsor, described the measure as a cleanup bill to align probation rules with the legislature—s intent. She said the bill removes an automatic revocation trigger for drug paraphernalia in situations involving marijuana and narrows the list of offenses that would require mandatory revocation. The sponsor also said the bill exempts automatic revocation when a court has ordered certain treatment or programming for an offender.
Bruce Bridal, an opposing witness, told the committee he supported parts of the bill but raised concerns about language that would change a discretionary "may be revoked" standard to a mandatory "shall be revoked" in one section. He also asked for clarification about wording that referenced the date of commission versus conviction, warning that the draft could trigger revocation for people arrested but later acquitted. Bridal suggested changing an "or" to an "and" in the cited provision to make the requirement consistent with the bill—s other language.
Committee records show multiple district attorneys and the Louisiana Sheriffs Association registered support for the measure. After the sponsor closed, Senator Cloud moved to report the bill favorably; there was no objection and the committee recorded the bill as reported favorably.
The committee did not adopt further amendments during the hearing. The sponsor asked senators to move the bill forward for favorable passage.
