Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Action Termination topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board votes to propose termination of Cedar Hill High School probationary teacher's contract

3296964 · May 5, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board accepted the superintendent's recommendation to propose termination of a non-Chapter 21 probationary contract for an employee identified in the meeting as Dominique Henry; the board voted 7-0 to proceed and directed the superintendent to deliver notice of proposed termination.

The Cedar Hill ISD Board of Trustees moved to accept the superintendent's recommendation and propose termination of the non-Chapter 21 probationary contract of an employee identified in the public record as Dominique Henry, the board recorded on June 27.

A board representative announced the administration's recommendation to terminate "with cause." Trustee Morgan moved the motion to accept the superintendent's recommendation and direct the superintendent to deliver the appropriate notice of proposed termination; Trustee Ramona Ross Bacon seconded. The motion passed on a recorded vote of 7-0.

The board stated the cause and related deliberations were discussed in executive session; the public motion referenced actions "as discussed in closed session." The motion directed the superintendent to deliver the notice of proposed termination to the employee; no further details about the allegations or evidence were provided in public session.

Under board procedure and Texas law, a proposed termination of a probationary non-Chapter 21 employee triggers formal notice and review steps; the board did not take additional public action at the meeting. The administration will proceed to provide the employee with the appropriate written notice as directed by the motion.

Trustees did not debate specific facts in public session after the vote. The action was recorded as approved 7-0.