Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Architectural Services topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Court exempts architectural procurement for Ag Extension office, invites two past architects to present qualifications
Summary
The court approved Order No. 12025 to exempt the purchase of architectural services for an agriculture extension office from competitive bidding, citing prior work by two architects; the court directed staff to invite DRG and Fitzpatrick to present qualifications and proposed fees.
Anderson County Commissioners Court approved Order No. 12025 to exempt the procurement of professional architectural services for design and plans of a new agriculture extension office from competitive bidding procedures, allowing county staff to contact two architects who previously performed work for the county to present qualifications and fee proposals.
A lengthy discussion cited state procurement and practice requirements for professional services. A county official reviewed statutory considerations the court must weigh when exempting professional services, including Texas Government Code provisions that prioritize selection based on demonstrated competence and qualifications rather than lowest bid. The speaker said sections of Government Code 2254 and 2269 and applicable provisions of the Occupations Code were consulted when drafting the order.
Court members agreed the county had used both Fitzpatrick and DRG on past county projects and that, if the exemption were adopted, either or both firms should be invited to present qualifications and fee proposals before the court approves any contract. The court discussed options if neither firm was suitable: in that case the county would put out a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) or Request for Proposals (RFP) as required by law.
On a motion by Commissioner Manns, seconded by Commissioner Hill, the court approved Order No. 12025 with a finding that the county has recently used Fitzpatrick and DRG and that those firms may be contacted to present qualifications and contracts for the design work. The court directed staff to schedule presentations and to return to the court with fee proposals for approval.
