Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Academic Calendar topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Alief ISD administration recommends ‘Calendar A’ for 2026–28; board will post both options for review and revisit in May

3296696 · April 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

District calendar committee recommended a two‑year cycle and favored a calendar that ends the semester before Christmas, preserves a fall break and finishes the school year for teachers before Memorial Day; trustees asked for the two draft calendars to be posted in board notes for additional review before a May vote.

Administrators presented two draft academic calendars for 2026–27 and 2027–28 and recommended “Calendar A,” the version committee feedback most often favored. The calendar committee — composed of campus principals, instructional and central‑office staff, athletics and other stakeholders — told trustees Calendar A preserves a fall break, finishes the first semester before the winter holiday and schedules the last student day before Memorial Day in 2027.

The recommendation followed committee guidance to align calendar planning with assessment windows, campus professional‑learning planning and senior‑year timelines (rank and GPA reporting before scholarship deadlines). The committee also advised the district to continue studying options such as longer school days or revised Professional Learning Community (PLC) timing to increase instructional minutes without adding days.

“Discussion came from multiple lenses, as I’ve talked about, and stakeholder groups. And, we considered the board feedback from our update in March,” Deputy Young said in presenting the calendars. Trustees asked detailed scheduling questions about spring break, Good Friday and how long‑range planning days will be used to ensure teachers attend and that campuses use the time productively.

Board members raised formatting and clarity issues: the two draft calendars and labeling caused confusion during the meeting, and trustees asked administration to place both Calendar A (administration’s recommendation) and Calendar B in board notes with a clear explanation of differences so members can review before a May vote. No final vote was taken; the board directed staff to post the calendars for review and return the item in May.

Why it matters: A two‑year calendar affects staff planning, testing schedules and family planning. The district emphasized finishing the semester before the winter break for seniors’ scholarship timelines and providing meaningful professional‑learning days tied to data and planning.

Ending: Administration will post both drafts with clear side‑by‑side presentation and the committee’s rationale in board notes; the board expects the issue to return for action at the May meeting.