Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Actions Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Katy ISD trustees approve superintendent evaluation, multiple personnel actions; deny Level 3 grievance
Summary
At its April 22 meeting the Katy ISD Board of Trustees approved the superintendent's annual evaluation and several contract and personnel actions, approved a consent agenda and denied a Level 3 FNG grievance; most votes were unanimous.
Get email alerts on the Board Actions Personnel topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees of the Katy Independent School District on April 22 approved the superintendent's annual evaluation and a slate of personnel actions, carried a consent agenda of routine items and denied a Level 3 grievance in open session following a closed briefing.
The board voted 7-0 to approve the superintendent's annual evaluation and related contract language. Trustees next approved contract recommendations for multiple categories of employees for the 2025–26 school year (probationary, term and dual-assignment contracts) by a 7-0 vote. The board also voted 7-0 to give notice of proposed nonrenewal of one employee term contract (Robert Miles) and separately approved the termination of two probationary employee contracts (Ilsa Gonzales and Frank Eiddis) at the end of the 2024–25 contract period, each by 7-0 votes.
The consent agenda (items 10.1–10.16) passed 7-0 on a single vote, as presented. Later in the meeting trustees reconvened after a closed session to consider a Level 3 FNG grievance (FNG 24-78). The board moved to deny the Level 3 grievance, thereby upholding the decisions of the Level 1 and Level 2 hearing officers; that motion carried 6 ayes with 1 abstention. Boardmember Miss Redmond announced an abstention for that vote.
No additional motions or amendments to the listed personnel items were recorded on the public audio. Where recorded, vote tallies matched the results announced from the dais.
The board took no new public-action motions on the discipline-policy concerns raised by public commenters during the meeting; those comments were heard as part of the public comment period and were not acted on as motions during the meeting.
Votes recorded in open session were documented on the board's keypad roll calls and announced aloud by the presiding officer at the time of each vote. The meeting adjourned after the grievance vote.
