Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Signs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission forwards sign‑code amendment (Sec. 30‑5) to council to streamline right‑of‑way agreements
Summary
The Green Bay Planning Commission voted to forward proposed amendments to section 30‑5 (general sign standards) to the City Council, a change staff says will let the zoning administrator process certain sign permits and associated hold‑harmless agreements to reduce multi‑department delays.
The Green Bay Planning Commission on May 12 recommended that the City Council adopt an amendment to section 30‑5 of the City’s zoning code that clarifies procedures for sign permits and allows the zoning administrator to process certain hold‑harmless agreements tied to signs in the public right‑of‑way.
City staff said the change is intended to streamline a multi‑step process that sometimes requires separate approvals from Public Works, the landmarks commission or electrical inspections. Community and Economic Development staff told commissioners the amendment would allow one staff contact to coordinate necessary approvals and sign the hold‑harmless agreement when appropriate.
Planner comments to the commission noted that some signs require additional steps—electrical permits, landmark reviews, or full hold‑harmless agreements when located in the right‑of‑way—which can create delays. The proposed code language clarifies that, when required, a hold‑harmless agreement may be executed through the zoning administrator’s office rather than routing separately through Public Works in every case. Staff told commissioners the change preserves required reviews (for electrical, landmark, or right‑of‑way concerns) while reducing redundant routing for administrative tasks.
No members of the public spoke on the item. The commission moved the item forward to the City Council for consideration at its May 20 meeting; the motion passed unanimously at the meeting and will appear on council’s agenda.
Staff said the amendment is primarily procedural and intended to speed permit turnaround for businesses and property owners that seek sign permits involving multiple departments. The amendment does not change substantive standards for sign size, placement or illumination; it clarifies administrative routing and which staff may execute agreements tied to sign placement in the public right‑of‑way.
The commission packet and staff memo accompanying the amendment note examples of circumstances that can require a hold‑harmless agreement (electrical connections, waiver of setback requirements into the right‑of‑way, or landmark‑review conditions) and say the proposed change centralizes the administrative execution of those agreements with the zoning administrator when appropriate. The commission’s recommendation now goes to the City Council for final action on May 20.
