Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel And Compensation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council retains city manager, approves 6% base-salary increase

3293785 · May 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After an executive session, the Coppell City Council voted to retain the city manager under his current engagement contract and approved a 6% increase in base salary, with continuation of existing compensation and benefits.

The Coppell City Council voted May 13 to retain the city manager and increase his base salary by 6%, continuing other compensation and benefits under his current engagement contract.

Council Member Walker moved the action, asking to “retain the city manager in accordance with his current engagement contract with a 6% increase in base salary and continuation of other compensation and benefits as stated.” The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Don Carroll. Council Member Kevin Nevills publicly thanked the city manager for his leadership during brief discussion before the vote.

The motion passed by voice vote. The meeting record shows the vote as announced from the dais: “Walker, Hinoza Smith, Carol Nevels, Prem Kumar, Matthew Hill in favor. None opposed. The motion carries.” The council did not provide additional public fiscal detail about the total dollar amount or effective date during the meeting; the motion relies on terms in the manager’s engagement contract.

City staff reported earlier in the meeting on capital projects and operations (see city project update), but the council did not tie the retention vote to any single project or budget amendment on the record at the May 13 session. The contract terms and the precise annual total cost of the 6% increase were not specified during the public meeting.

Because the action followed executive session, the council recorded only the public motion and vote at the open session. No amendments to the employment contract were announced at the time of the vote.