Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Commission finds reasonable grounds for retaliation claim but not for discrimination in Abbott termination case

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After a contested hearing, the Maine Human Rights Commission rejected the discrimination claim against Abbott Laboratories but found reasonable grounds that Samuel Losingu (Losingu) was retaliated against related to his efforts to secure Ramadan accommodations for employees.

The commission heard a workplace discrimination and retaliation appeal from complainant Samuel Losingu (spelled variously in the record). Attorney David Weber for the complainant urged the panel to focus on contemporaneous employer documents: a termination worksheet listed an entry dated March 30, 2022, saying HR had emailed supervisors directions about managing employees observing Ramadan and that Losingu failed to follow those directions. Weber argued the worksheet’s placement and language made that March 30 note a causal factor in the termination.

Weber told the commission that the employer had not produced a copy of the referenced HR email and contended…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans