Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Strategic Plan Kpis topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board receives draft strategic‑plan KPIs; members asked to propose measures by June
Summary
Staff presented draft key performance indicators (KPIs) tied to the district strategic plan and asked board members to submit priorities for measurable metrics; examples included school accreditation, inclusion measures for students with disabilities, and transportation on‑time targets.
A district strategic‑plan team presenter reviewed draft key performance indicators (KPIs) with the board and outlined a timeline for finalizing measures and leadership retreat work that will produce strategies tied to those KPIs.
Why it matters: Board members were asked to contribute priorities; KPIs are intended to focus district actions, enable accountability and guide resource decisions over the multi‑year strategic plan.
Notable draft KPIs and examples presented: - Accreditation: a draft KPI noted “by [date], 100% of our schools will be accredited,” measured by the state performance framework. - Inclusion for students with disabilities: an example KPI read that by 2030, 80% of students with disabilities would spend 80% of the day in general‑education settings; presenters described this as a standard used to guide least‑restrictive environment goals. - Staff/retention: an example KPI set a target that by 2030 the cafeteria worker turnover rate would be at or below 10%. - Transportation: a draft KPI proposed a 10% increase in on‑time arrivals by 2027.
Process and next steps: Presenters said KPIs are still in draft form; the board will receive a draft before the June meeting and members were given until that meeting to provide input. Presenters emphasized that KPIs should be measurable, time‑bound and tied to strategy so the district can track progress and allocate resources accordingly.
Board members discussed measurement challenges (for example, longitudinal graduate tracking) and the need to create data collection mechanisms where appropriate. No board votes were taken during the KPI overview; staff said they will return with a draft for board review in June.
