Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pedestrian Pathways Rail Crossings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council weighs pedestrian safety and pathway projects at Glenwood crossing and along Riley, and hears about Alaska Railroad bills
Summary
The council discussed pedestrian-safety and pathway projects, including Glenwood rail crossing replacement and conversion of a Riley Avenue segment to a separated pathway to Lake Lucille Park; staff also described invoices from the Alaska Railroad for crossing maintenance.
Get email alerts on the Pedestrian Pathways Rail Crossings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council members reviewed several safety and pedestrian-access proposals tied to upcoming capital projects and right-of-way issues: a Glenwood rail crossing replacement and pathway connection, a Riley Avenue pathway to Lake Lucille Park, and a local match request for Parks Highway improvements near Sun Mountain.
Staff said the Alaska Railroad inspects and bills for crossing maintenance and that the city received a recent invoice of about $8,000 for inspection and repairs at four crossings; they said crossing components have expected replacement cycles (about 20 years) and that Glenwood Crossing is past useful life on several components. Replacing Glenwood Crossing offers a chance to complete a missing pedestrian-pathway link that currently forces pedestrians and students into the roadway.
On the Riley Avenue pathway the city is pursuing MPO funding and said local match money could be used to add a separate bikewalk path that would improve connectivity to Lake Lucille Park; staff cautioned that wetlands exist in parts of the corridor and that design would need to address drainage and right-of-way constraints.
Staff also reported a productive design meeting with DOT about Parks Highway safety near Sun Mountain and said DOT is considering channelization options (right-in/right-out islands and medians) to reduce hazardous left turns; the project would likely require a local match and phased work. Council members asked staff to continue coordination and to return with more detailed designs and funding estimates.
No final appropriations were approved; staff said they would return with design-level information and match estimates ahead of future council action.

