Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Naming topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board agrees to seek wider community feedback after report finds Magruder school likely indirectly named for Confederate general
Summary
A limited staff review found the Magruder school was likely named for the Fort Magruder area — itself most likely named for Confederate Gen. John B. Magruder — and the board directed staff to develop a countywide engagement plan and survey options before any renaming decision.
York County School Board members on May 12 asked staff to gather broader community input before deciding whether to rename Magruder Elementary, after a staff review concluded the school was likely indirectly named for Confederate General John B. Magruder.
Assistant Superintendent Doctor Carroll and Doctor Butler summarized a limited investigation into local historical records, including material at the Swem Library and the county’s 1983 “Footprints” history collection. Carroll said the historic Fort Magruder and a village called Magruder predated the school; Fort Magruder was named for General John B. Magruder and the nearby community had its own post office before Camp Peary occupied the land. The first Magruder school on the present site opened in 1951, Carroll said; documentary evidence did not show the school was explicitly named after the general, but the name is historically connected to the fort and the place.
Butler and Carroll said their limited review concluded the school is indirectly named for the general because the fort and the place carried that name. Board members asked for broader community input before any board action. One board member noted policy FFA prohibits naming a school after a living or deceased person and that renaming could potentially affect similarly named schools (for example, “Tabb” schools named after a local postmistress in the 19th century). Several board members said they had received emails both for and against a name change and recommended a countywide survey and stakeholder outreach. Board members also noted cost implications of a rename and asked staff to present options that would guard against illegitimate or duplicate responses.
Why it matters: renaming a school has symbolic, historical and cost implications and could prompt similar questions about other schools whose names originate in local place names that reference individuals. The board asked staff to develop a draft outreach plan and suggested using the division’s survey platforms; staff said they would return with draft survey language and options for distribution at the next meeting or the June 2 work session.
Ending: staff will prepare survey and outreach options for board review; no renaming decision was made at the work session.
