Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Oregon hearing on HB 3835 splits advocates over restraints, seclusion and out-of-state placements
Summary
Supporters told the House Committee on Rules that clarifying definitions and limited out-of-state placements are needed to restore capacity for youth behavioral health; opponents, including parents and disability advocates, said the bill would weaken abuse protections and risk sending children to poorly supervised out‑of‑state facilities.
The House Committee on Rules held a public hearing May 12 on House Bill 3835, an omnibus measure that would change how Oregon defines and investigates the use of restraint and seclusion on children in care and create a process for certain out‑of‑state placements. The committee heard more than three hours of testimony from state leaders, clinicians, providers, parents and disability advocates; committee staff said more than 40 people had signed up to testify and written testimony will be accepted through Wednesday at 8 a.m.
Supporters said the bill is a targeted response to a statewide shortage of capacity for children with acute behavioral health needs. "We are in a continuous crisis in Oregon's children behavioral health system," said Ajit Jetmalani, a child psychiatrist and OHSU professor, citing state data that screenings of child‑caring agencies peaked at about 1,750 in 2024 while founded abuse allegations remained in the low twenties. Advocates for providers, including Jamie Vandergahn, CEO of Trillium Family Services, told the committee that staff and programs face career‑ending investigations for technical or documentation errors…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
