Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Accessory Dwelling Units topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board approves second‑dwelling application in R10L; members call for policy discussion on ADUs
Summary
The Planning Board approved a second‑dwelling application in the R10L district but signaled the need for a separate board discussion about how by‑right accessory dwelling units and second dwellings should interact across the neighborhood.
The Nantucket Planning Board on May 12 approved a special‑permit application for a second dwelling in the R10L district but used the discussion to flag broader concerns about the island’s recent changes to accessory dwelling unit rules and their effect on neighborhood character.
Application and vote: The applicant sought a special permit to add a second dwelling on an R10L lot. After public comment and discussion, the board voted to approve the application with the staff’s findings and conditions; the motion passed unanimously.
Why it matters: Several board members and residents said this application illustrated the first time the town had to implement newly approved ADU rules in an established neighborhood. Board members worried the combination of by‑right ADUs and approved second dwellings could materially increase year‑round occupancy and traffic in quiet residential areas.
Key concerns and staff advice: Board members urged the planning office to schedule a focused meeting to examine how ADUs (by right) and special‑permit second dwellings interact with the R‑districts. Planning staff said they were preparing options, including special‑permit provisions that might require larger ADU sizes or other site controls where appropriate. “This is the first application where the rubber meets the road with the new ADUs,” one board member said, urging public outreach to affected neighborhoods.
Applicant perspective: The applicant’s representative and the project team presented the site plan, explained the design and said the submission met bylaw criteria for the second‑dwelling special permit. Planning staff recommended approval subject to findings and standard conditions.
Public comment: No members of the public registered substantive objections during the hearing, though several board members noted that residents in similar neighborhoods should be invited to participate in the upcoming policy discussion.
Next steps: The board approved the special permit as presented and directed staff to schedule a near‑term meeting to refine how ADUs will be integrated into district regulations and how the town will communicate changes to affected neighborhoods.
Quote: “This is the first application where we’ve really seen this interaction… the public needs to be aware,” a board member said, urging a follow‑up board meeting on ADU integration.
Ending: The application was approved under existing rules; the board asked staff to convene a dedicated session to consider zoning adjustments and public outreach before additional similar applications are decided.
